Production, resources and infrastructure

Services, institutions and communities

What we know deeply

How we work with you

Production, resources and infrastructure
Large and multi-site organizations Forestry, wood and processing Construction
Services, institutions and communities
Health and social services Education Municipal, public and community sector
Organizational culture Cultural intelligence Leadership and management practices Onboarding, integration and retention Diversity strategy and governance
Skills development Diagnostic Conseils Speaking engagements Regional Roundtables International recruitment
Insights
About us
Contact
Français English
My account

CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE

Understand before interpreting. Adapt without losing yourself.

One and the same situation can produce several interpretations. Cultural intelligence serves to tell what actually happened apart from what we believe we understood, and then to adjust how we act.

WHAT IS VISIBLE

WHAT PRODUCES IT

One signal, four readings, one check, one action A single signal enters from the left and follows the common axis. At the level of the readings, it splits into four trajectories that spread apart and continue in parallel: four interpretations coexist, and a dotted measurement shows the distance between the highest and the lowest. The four trajectories then pass through a zone of verification. Two come out dotted and stop: they have been set aside. The other two draw closer without ever quite merging. From that convergence, a solid, continuous line sets off: the action. All the trajectories have the same thickness: it is not their strength that distinguishes them, it is their direction.
  1. Situation
  2. Readings
  3. Verification
  4. Adjustment
  5. Action
The fact is the same. The interpretations are not.

Phenomenon

What we do in a fraction of a second, without deciding to do it.

THE INTERVAL THAT DOES NOT EXIST FOR US

We do not react only to what happens. We react to what we believe it means.

A behaviour is observable. A delay, a sentence, the absence of a question, a way of saying no. Its meaning is not. We produce that meaning, very quickly, from our experience, our professional habits, the context, the reporting relationship and what we have learned to consider normal.

That reading is useful: without it, no decision would be possible in the real time of work. It becomes costly when it is taken for the fact itself, because that is the moment a hypothesis starts operating as a certainty.

Between the situation and our reaction, an interpretation has already taken place.

The interval where interpretation slips in At the top, a situation and a reaction are joined by a continuous line: this is what we believe we are doing, reacting directly to what happens. At the bottom, the same path is interrupted in the middle by an interval bounded by two markers. Inside that interval, a short trajectory rises and falls back: the interpretation, produced so fast that it goes unnoticed. The path then resumes to the reaction.
  • What we believe we are doing
  • What actually happens

FACT AND INTERPRETATION

One and the same fact can support several equally plausible readings.

Observable fact

After receiving feedback, the person stays silent for a few seconds.

Possible interpretations

  • She disagrees
  • She did not understand
  • She accepts
  • She is thinking
  • She hesitates to contradict her manager
  • She is searching for words

None of these readings is true because it comes to us first. None is false because it surprises us. At this stage, they have exactly the same status: hypotheses.

What did you actually observe?

This question is the pivot of the whole approach. It does not ask what you felt, or what you concluded. It asks what, in the situation, would have been visible or audible to any other person present.

WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT

A capacity that develops, not a catalogue of cultures.

What it is

The ability to understand, question and adjust your reading and your behaviour when reference points are not necessarily shared.

What it is not

  • An encyclopedia of national cultures.
  • A list of international etiquette rules.
  • An ability to guess what someone is thinking based on where they come from.

What it produces

  • clarify
  • question
  • communicate
  • check understanding
  • work with uncertainty
  • adjust an intervention
  • decide with better information

WHAT THIS EXPERTISE IS NOT

Cultural intelligence is not knowledge of cultures.

Knowing the context of a setting, a trade, a region or a country is useful. That knowledge helps you form better hypotheses and ask better questions. It never lets you deduce the intention of a specific person.

Two people from the same country, the same trade or the same team can read a situation in radically different ways. An origin is not an explanation: at best, it is one element of the context.

Two ways of getting from general knowledge to a person On the left, five bands stand for general knowledge about a context. A dotted path leaves those bands and tries to reach a person directly, on the right: it is stopped short by a bar, because no generality gives you an individual's intention. A second path, continuous, descends, passes through three verification points, then rises again to that same person: it reaches them.
  • Direct deduction: stopped
  • Observation, question, verification: reaches

WHAT THIS CHANGES

Knowing a context helps you form better hypotheses and ask better questions. It never replaces checking with the person concerned.

No origin allows you to deduce an intention.

THE GROUND WHERE READINGS DIVERGE

Some questions never come up as long as everyone answers them the same way.

These eight areas do not describe cultures. They are questions for analysis: they help pinpoint, in a specific situation, exactly where two people do not share the same implicit answer.

Authority
What counts as a legitimate contribution, and what may be perceived as a challenge?
Initiative
How far can a person act without prior approval?
Disagreement
When, where and how is disagreement expected to be voiced?
Communication
Which part of the message is supposed to be explicit, and which part is assumed to be understood?
Time
What counts as a realistic commitment, an urgency or a delay in this situation?
Uncertainty
How much precision is needed before starting to act?
Group
Is accountability mainly thought of as individual, collective or shared?
Feedback
How can criticism be clear enough while still being possible to hear?

None of these questions has a universal answer, and none is settled by assigning an answer to a country, a generation or a trade. They are there to open a conversation, never to close it.

THE MOSAÏCA READING TOOL

Six movements to take back control of a reading.

The mechanism described above happens on its own. These six movements are what you do deliberately to make it more reliable. They are read in order, but you come back to them as soon as new information appears.

  1. Observe

    What actually happened?

  2. Distinguish

    What is a fact and what is already my interpretation?

  3. Widen

    What other explanations are plausible?

  4. Verify

    What can I ask, observe or test?

  5. Adjust

    What can be adapted without compromising the objective or the accountability?

  6. Act

    Which response is now the most relevant?

The first two movements are often enough to change the rest of a conversation.

THE FOUNDATION

The cultural intelligence construct was formalized in the early 2000s in the intercultural management literature, notably through the work of P. Christopher Earley and Soon Ang. It describes a capacity that develops rather than a fixed trait: a metacognitive dimension, noticing that you are interpreting; a cognitive dimension, knowing the contexts; a motivational dimension, being willing to stay in an uncomfortable situation; and a behavioural dimension, concretely adjusting what you do.

The Cultural Intelligence Scale, developed by Soon Ang, Linn Van Dyne and their colleagues, makes it possible to explore these dimensions. It is a starting point for conversation, never a verdict on a person. At Mosaïca, the reading always starts from concrete professional situations, never from an overall score.

THE SECOND HALF OF THE SENTENCE

Adapting does not mean giving up the framework.

Adaptation concerns how an objective is reached, never the objective itself. An organization that confuses the two ends up giving up legitimate requirements in the belief that it is being open, or refusing any adjustment in the belief that it is defending its standards.

A trajectory that varies within limits that do not move Two solid horizontal lines bound the space above and below: these are the limits that are not negotiable. Between them, a continuous trajectory moves widely, changing rhythm and height: this is adaptation. At one point it approaches the upper limit and a short vertical mark sends it back inside. It reaches the right of the frame without ever having crossed it.
  • What stays: the limits
  • What adapts: the trajectory

What can adapt

  • language
  • how things are explained
  • the pace of a conversation
  • how a contribution is invited
  • how feedback is given
  • how understanding is checked
  • certain rituals
  • certain coordination mechanisms
  • how the relationship is built

What has to stay clear

  • safety
  • legal obligations
  • dignity
  • professional responsibilities
  • quality standards
  • ethical requirements
  • the limits of roles
  • the organization's fundamental commitments

Adaptation is a way of acting better. It erases neither the objective nor the accountability.

HOW WE WORK

We do not label a situation intercultural before examining it.

  1. Movement 01

    Understand the situation.

    We examine the facts, the people involved, the interpretations already formed, the context, the responsibilities, the interactions that took place and the frames of reference that may be at play.

    Possible outcomeA structured reading that separates facts, interpretations and hypotheses.

  2. Movement 02

    Test the hypotheses.

    Depending on the engagement, verification takes different forms. None is required in every case.

    • interviews
    • observation
    • analysis of a critical incident
    • role-play
    • communication analysis
    • decoding workshop
    • available data
    • debriefing

    Possible outcomeA better-documented understanding of the mechanisms behind the misunderstanding, the tension or the difficulty.

  3. Movement 03

    Adjust practices.

    We work in particular on communication, management, feedback, integration, coordination, leadership, decision-making, teamwork and the preparation of managers.

    Possible outcomeShared reference points, adapted practices, tools, skills development or an action plan.

No diagnostic is a definitive truth about a person or a group. A reading remains a reading: it is made to be corrected when new information appears.

An organization states that it wants open communication, initiative, constructive feedback. It then organizes roles, decision-making mechanisms, spaces for discussion. Then each person interprets what they can actually say, to whom, how far they can act, and what happens when they get it wrong. Cultural intelligence sheds light on the gaps that run through interpretation. It does not explain the others: a difficulty may come from workload, from the role, from skills, from working conditions or from the relationship. Confusing the two leads to treating an organizational issue as a cultural one, or the reverse.

GOING FURTHER

Insights on cultural intelligence.

Five ordinary situations, taken one by one: what was observed, what was assumed, and what could still be checked.

Engagement

Three ways in, depending on what the organization is trying to achieve.

THREE WAYS IN

Read a situation, build a capacity, embed a practice.

Read

Understand a specific situation before deciding what to do with it.

POSSIBLE SITUATIONS

  • a persistent misunderstanding between two people or two teams
  • a tension that the known facts do not explain
  • divergent interpretations of the same behaviour
  • a manager who does not understand certain reactions from their team
  • an international team or a multi-site collaboration
  • an organization that wants to tell an individual, organizational or intercultural issue apart

Possible deliverablesA reading of the situation, a map of the interpretations at play, working hypotheses, points to verify and priorities for action.

Describe a situation Discover our advisory service

Build

Make the approach usable by the people who live the situations.

FOR WHOM

  • managers and teams
  • people called on to work in culturally diverse environments
  • teams welcoming new colleagues
  • people on international assignment
  • teams spread across several sites or several countries

The work is based on real situations brought by participants: describe a fact, produce several readings, choose what can be verified, then take up the conversation differently. The format follows the need: training, workshop, role-play, simulation, case analysis, debrief or program.

See skills development See the Cultural intelligence training

Embed

Move verification from an individual reflex to an organizational practice.

A person can learn to check their interpretations. An organization has to plan where and when that check takes place: at selection, at onboarding, when assigning a mandate, when giving feedback, when handling a conflict or when coordinating several sites.

POSSIBLE AREAS

  • recruitment
  • onboarding and integration
  • leadership
  • conflict management
  • internal communication
  • international mobility
  • client relations
  • teamwork
  • multi-site management

Possible deliverablesShared reference points, verification moments built into processes, adjustments to management practices and tools managers can actually use.

When the organization recruits internationally, this expertise extends into a separate service, which prepares managers, teams and the people recruited. International recruitment.

BEFORE CORRECTING A BEHAVIOUR

A quick interpretation can become a decision. A more accurate reading can change what follows.

Mosaïca helps organizations examine situations where frames of reference are not shared, tell what was observed apart from what was assumed, verify what can be verified, and then adjust management practices without giving up what has to stay clear.

Before correcting a behaviour, there is still the matter of understanding what you are actually looking at.

Describe a situation Discover our advisory service
The Cultural intelligence training Discover our advisory service