Insight Cultural intelligence
Adapting without lowering the bar
The objective can stay exactly the same while the way you bring someone to it changes. Confusing the two leads either to giving up or to rigidity.
THE CONFUSION
Two opposite errors, produced by the same confusion.
An organization that confuses the method with the objective ends up giving up legitimate requirements in the belief that it is being open. Another, starting from the same confusion, refuses any adjustment in the belief that it is defending its standards. Both assumed that adapting the method meant negotiating the result.
Safety, legal obligations, dignity, professional responsibilities, quality standards and ethical requirements are not negotiable. What is open to discussion is the path for getting someone there.
WHAT ADAPTS
The trajectory, not the destination.
The language used. How an expectation is explained. The pace of a conversation. How a contribution is invited, how feedback is given, how you check that an instruction has been understood. Certain team rituals and certain coordination mechanisms. How the relationship is built before raising a difficult subject.
None of these adjustments reduces what is expected. They only make the expectation more legible to the person it is addressed to.
Adaptation is a way of acting better. It erases neither the objective nor the accountability.
IN PRACTICE
Name the requirement, then discuss the path.
The order matters. When the requirement is named first, and named clearly, the adjustment that follows can no longer be read as giving up: it visibly becomes a means. When the adjustment comes first, the same conversation suggests that the expectation is negotiable.
That clarity also protects the person concerned. A requirement that was never explicitly stated cannot be held against them later.
What has to stay the same no matter what, and what can change in how we get there?
WHAT NOT ADJUSTING COSTS
Adapting nothing is not a neutral position.
An organization that refuses any adjustment often believes it is protecting its standards. In practice, it transfers the entire effort of adaptation onto the person arriving, and does so without saying it, since nothing has been stated.
The requirement is then maintained on paper and weakened in practice: what has not been understood cannot be applied reliably. The gaps that follow are then read as a lack of rigour, which closes the loop. The standard was not defended; it was only made harder to reach.
Refusing to adjust the method does not make the requirement more solid. It only makes reaching it more uncertain.
This text goes deeper into one dimension of our expertise The full mechanism, the demonstration that makes it visible and the possible forms of engagement are set out on the expertise page.
Cultural intelligenceCONTINUE
Other insights on cultural intelligence.
- Insight Before correcting a behaviour, you need to know what you are looking at What we observe is a fact.
- Insight Silence does not always mean what you think A few seconds of silence can trigger a conclusion.
- Insight An instruction can be clear to the person giving it and ambiguous to the person receiving it An instruction can be perfectly phrased and still produce several readings.
- Insight Not everything is cultural Looking for a cultural explanation too early can keep you from seeing the real problem.