Production, resources and infrastructure

Services, institutions and communities

What we know deeply

How we work with you

Production, resources and infrastructure
Large and multi-site organizations Forestry, wood and processing Construction
Services, institutions and communities
Health and social services Education Municipal, public and community sector
Organizational culture Cultural intelligence Leadership and management practices Onboarding, integration and retention Diversity strategy and governance
Skills development Diagnostic Conseils Speaking engagements Regional Roundtables International recruitment
Insights
About us
Contact
Français English
My account

EXPERTISE

An intention only becomes a practice once it is governed

Governing diversity means deciding who carries what, with which powers, which indicators, which trade-offs and what accountability.

A stated commitment stays fragile as long as no one knows clearly who decides, who carries the action, what has to be measured and how gaps are settled.

WHAT IS STATED

WHAT HOLDS IT

The governance loop, from intention to reassessment Seven moments are lined up horizontally and joined by a continuous line: the intention, the priorities, the responsibilities, the indicators, the trade-offs, the follow-up and the reassessment. Each is marked by a solid square, except the first, which is an open square: the intention exists before anyone carries it. Below that line, a trajectory leaves the last moment, the reassessment, drops down, crosses the whole composition to the left and rises again to the second moment, the priorities: what has been reassessed comes back to change the priorities. The loop is closed and nothing ends at the last point.
  1. Intention
  2. Priorities
  3. Responsibilities
  4. Indicators
  5. Trade-offs
  6. Follow-up
  7. Reassessment
Governance is not a series of steps taken once. It is a loop that comes back, at a chosen interval, to what it had prioritized.

OUR POSITION

An intention without structure stays fragile.

Two organizations can want exactly the same thing, with the same sincerity and the same commitment from their leadership. Only one has what it takes for that commitment to survive a departure, a reorganization or a difficult year.

ORGANIZATION A

The intention is carried.

  • Stated values
  • Public commitments
  • Training offered
  • Goodwill

Everything rests on the buy-in of the people currently in post. The initiative moves forward as long as someone carries it.

ORGANIZATION B

The intention is governed.

  • Named owners
  • Settled priorities
  • A steering committee
  • Tracked indicators
  • A review calendar
  • Trade-offs made

The initiative keeps moving forward even when the person who launched it is no longer there.

Both organizations want the same thing. Only one has a system to sustain it.

The difference is not a matter of conviction, and it does not show in the documents. It appears the day a priority competes with another, an indicator deteriorates, or the person who carried the file moves on.

THE DISTRIBUTION

Who actually governs diversity?

The question looks simple and rarely gets a clear answer. “Leadership,” “HR,” “everyone”: three answers that, in practice, often describe the same situation — one where no one has the formal responsibility to prepare, decide, execute or escalate.

  1. Management

    Gives the mandate, settles the trade-offs and protects the priorities when they compete with other urgent matters.

  2. Owner of the initiative

    Prepares the information, tracks the actions, organizes the steering and makes visible what requires a decision.

  3. HR and the functions concerned

    Translate decisions into policies, processes and systems, where they become binding.

  4. Operations and managers

    Make decisions real in daily work. Without them, a policy remains an accurate document with no effect.

THE STEERING COMMITTEE

A point of coordination, not an owner.

The committee receives a dashboard, a progress report and the files that require a trade-off. It reviews, analyzes, prioritizes, validates and decides. Out of it come decisions, owners, deadlines and a next review date.

What it does not do matters just as much: it does not stand in for HR, for managers or for leadership. Its role is to keep responsibility moving, not to concentrate it.

Inputs and outputs Inputs: dashboard, indicators, progress report, files to arbitrate. Outputs: decisions, actions, owners, minutes, next review.

THE CHAIN

Measuring is not enough. An indicator becomes useful when it can lead to a decision.

Between a data point and a real change, there is a chain of seven links. It almost always breaks in the same place: between the reading and the priority, or between the decision and the owner. A dashboard can be flawless and steer nothing at all.

  1. Data

    What the organization observes and records.

  2. Reading

    What the data means, in context.

  3. Priority

    What deserves to be dealt with before the rest.

  4. Decision

    Act, wait, or confirm that there is nothing to do.

  5. Owner

    A named person, not a function.

  6. Deadline

    A date, without which nothing can be verified.

  7. Follow-up

    The review that confirms, corrects or escalates.

Deciding that no action is needed is also a governance decision, provided it is taken, dated and owned.

STEERING

An indicator has to lead somewhere.

The purpose of a dashboard is not to be complete. Its purpose is to trigger something: a discussion, a decision, an escalation, or the explicit confirmation that the situation is stable. Here is the shape that reasoning takes, independently of the numbers.

Steering template. The labels illustrate the decision mechanics; they reproduce no organization's data.

Example structure of a steering table: priority, indicator, owner, status, expected decision and next review.
Priority Indicator tracked Owner Status Expected decision Next review
Integration of new people Completion of the onboarding journey Owner of the initiative Being tracked None, continue measuring Next committee
Fairness of selection practices Gaps observed between units Human resources To be analyzed Qualify the gap before acting Within 30 days
First-year retention Departures over the period Operations leadership Trade-off required Choose between two competing priorities Committee under way
Manager training Coverage of the target teams Skills development Stable Confirm and space out the review Next quarter

What sets this template apart from a report is the last two columns. Without an expected decision, an indicator is just information. Without a next review, a decision is just an intention.

Four statuses are usually enough: to be analyzed, being tracked, trade-off required, stable. It is the movement from one to the next that constitutes steering.

Two people talking over printed dashboards, one pointing at a chart with a pen.
The moment that counts is not when the indicator is produced. It is when someone has to draw a consequence from it.

THE DISTINCTION

Diagnosing is not enough. You have to steer.

A serious diagnostic draws on several sources: a structured assessment, a document review and interviews with stakeholders who do not see the same organization. Out of it come gaps, solid areas, fragile areas and recommendations.

Then comes the moment the report is delivered. That is exactly where most initiatives stop, not out of negligence, but because no one had planned what should happen next.

A diagnostic describes a state. Governance organizes what comes next.

  • DIAGNOSTIC

    Where do we stand?

    What gaps do we observe?

    What priorities emerge?

  • GOVERNANCE

    Who decides next?

    Who carries the action?

    How is progress tracked?

    When do we look at the situation again?

Someone standing at a work desk covered with documents, plans and tracking binders.
The action plan is an output of the diagnostic. What keeps it alive already belongs to governance.

THE INSTRUMENT

The Intégramètre as a steering instrument.

The Intégramètre is a tool developed by Mosaïca. It draws on a structured framework, on the ISO 30415 standard, on field experience and on academic validation. Its role on this page is not the score it produces: it is the place it occupies in the loop.

  1. MeasureObserve actual practices rather than stated intentions.
  2. See the gapsTell solid areas apart from fragile ones.
  3. PrioritizeBy real impact and effort required, not by ease.
  4. Feed the action planTurn priorities into assigned, dated actions.
  5. ReassessMeasure again, to find out whether anything has moved.

What the tool does not do The Intégramètre informs the decision. It replaces neither governance nor judgment. The Intégramètre diagnostic

THE LIMITS OF SELF-ASSESSMENT

An organization knows its processes. It has a harder time seeing what it has normalized.

An internal committee ends up sharing a common reading, and that is precisely what makes it effective. The flip side is that it stops seeing certain things: a responsibility left ambiguous for so long that no one questions it any more, a gap that has become routine, an indicator that keeps being produced without anyone using it.

An outside party does not bring a superior reading. It brings the ability to make things objective, to set several readings of the same situation against one another, to tell a symptom from a mechanism, and to make explicit the trade-offs that until then were settled implicitly.

Its only real advantage: it has nothing to protect in the organization as it stands.

GOING FURTHER

Insights on governance.

This page shows the system. Our insights take up, one by one, the precise places where it gives way.

All insights on governance

HOW WE WORK

Three ways in, depending on what the system is missing.

  1. Diagnose and prioritize

    Make the situation objective, tell solid areas apart from fragile ones, and turn observations into priorities ranked by impact and effort.

  2. Structure the governance

    Name the owners, define what gets decided where, set up the steering committee and clarify what goes up, what gets settled and what comes back down.

  3. Set up steering and follow-up

    Choose the indicators that call for a decision, set the pace of reviews, and keep the loop alive through to reassessment.

An intention only becomes a practice once it is governed.

Talk about your diversity governance Discover our advisory service

Our advisory services The Intégramètre diagnostic The insights