Insight Organizational culture
Reading a culture: what is intended, what is organized, what is experienced
A culture cannot be read in the words an organization uses to describe itself, nor in an opinion about the working atmosphere. Here is how we proceed, what this reading produces and what it cannot do.
- What is intended
- What is organized
- What is experienced
WHY THREE LEVELS, NOT TWO
Setting the message against the reality is comfortable, and almost always sterile.
That opposition turns a functional problem into a trial of intentions. It leaves a leadership team with an impossible choice: admit hypocrisy or deny what its teams are living.
A third level changes the conversation. Between what an organization wants and what it experiences, there is what it has organized. That is almost always where the explanation lies, and it is where something can be changed.
What is intended
Close to the stated surface
The mission, the values, the strategy, the priorities, the commitments and the identity the organization wants to preserve or develop.
What do we want to be recognizable in our decisions and our behaviours?
What is organized
The layer of rules and responsibilities
The roles, the rules, the processes, the tools, the working conditions, the recognition mechanisms and the responsibilities that guide action.
Does our organization genuinely make the behaviours we expect possible?
What is experienced
The result observable day to day
Daily decisions, conversations, tensions, learning, tolerated behaviours, recognized behaviours and people's concrete experience.
What do people actually understand from what repeats?
A reading is not manufactured in a meeting room. It is built from what executives say about the same situations: what they wanted, what they had organized, and what actually happened.
The full cross-section — five paths descending from the first level to the third, one of which adapts and one of which clearly diverges — is set out on the expertise page: see the model.
A GAP IS NOT A VERDICT
Four very different causes produce the same apparent symptom.
- 01An individual difficulty. A person does not have the means, the experience or the support they need. The gap disappears when their situation changes.
- 02A management practice. A manager applies a way of doing things that is their own. The gap is confined to their scope and repeats wherever they are involved.
- 03A contradiction in the system. The organization asks for a behaviour that its own way of working makes costly. The gap appears among people whose only common factor is the process they use.
- 04A cultural norm. The behaviour has repeated long enough that it no longer has to be asked for. The gap survives the departure of the people who established it.
Training a person to correct a contradiction in the system fixes nothing, and costs a great deal.
HOW WE PROCEED
Gather, connect, reduce.
A useful reading does not stop when it has accumulated everything. It stops when it has kept the few levers an organization can genuinely act on.
-
MOVEMENT 01
Understand what is at play.
We examine the intentions, the decisions, the recurring situations, the rules, the management practices, the stories told and the differences between teams.
- document review
- interviews
- focus groups
- critical incidents
- available data
- observation
- collective reading workshops
-
MOVEMENT 02
Make the gaps visible.
We connect what is intended, what is organized and what is experienced, in order to tell apart the four causes described above. This is the moment when two contradictory observations become useful rather than awkward.
-
MOVEMENT 03
Act on what produces them.
We work on management practices, responsibilities, mechanisms for passing things on, rituals and the conditions that reinforce behaviours. Never on the symptom alone.
THE LIMITS, STATED UP FRONT
What a culture reading cannot do.
- ,It does not deliver a final verdict: a culture keeps forming while you are reading it.
- ,It does not rank an organization on a scale. There is no good culture in the abstract, only greater or lesser consistency.
- ,It does not replace a decision: we make trade-offs visible; we do not decide what has to be preserved.
- ,It is not the same thing as a measurement instrument. The Intégramètre documents onboarding and integration practices; it does not read a culture.
This text goes deeper into one dimension of our expertise What this reading leads to next — read, align or embed — is set out on the expertise page.
Our forms of engagementCONTINUE
Other insights on organizational culture.
- Insight How an organizational culture is actually built What turns an isolated decision into an established norm.
- Insight What is stated, what is reinforced Two organizations can state the same thing and teach the opposite.
- Insight Several cultures within one organization Where is the line between a variation and a break?
- Insight Passing on a culture as the organization grows Managers do not pass on a message: they are one.
Do you know what your organization is reinforcing today, without having asked for it?
We read what repeats before proposing anything at all.