The reflex is to measure diversity by counting people.
Does a headcount tell you what has to change, or only what already exists?
Production, resources and infrastructure
What we know deeply
How we work with you
Build a small number of defensible indicators, connect them to real decisions and move past dashboards no one uses.
Are you measuring what counts, or what is easy to count?
Choose→ Define→ Read→ Decide
The reflex is to measure diversity by counting people.
Does a headcount tell you what has to change, or only what already exists?
Most dashboards cover only representation, the family that is simplest to produce.
What is missing for an indicator to become a decision?
An indicator moves, and an executive committee expects an explanation at the next meeting.
Does the variation come from a real change, or from a definition problem?
Some indicators reassure. Others are uncomfortable.
Does the dashboard keep the ones that inform, or only the ones that reassure?
You keep what serves a decision, and set the rest aside.
By the end of the training, the participant will be able to:
A credible dashboard covers all four. Most cover only the first, because it is the simplest to produce.
Dashboard
4 families that complement one another, without balancing out mechanically.
I describe who is here.
The composition of the workforce, by level and by function: necessary, never sufficient.
I examine how decisions are made.
The fairness of selection, promotion and opportunity-allocation practices.
I measure what people experience.
The sense of inclusion, the safety to speak up, real access to opportunities.
I look at what it produces.
Retention, progression and team performance.
The four families do not balance out mechanically: two or three indicators tracked seriously are worth more than a complete dashboard that gets abandoned.
The same framework. Three levels of depth, depending on what your committee needs to be able to do.
Choose the right indicators and set the rest aside.
Ideal for a committee that wants to clarify quickly what it should track.
Define solid indicators and read them accurately.
Ideal for HR teams and executives building their indicators.
Steer the dashboard and account for it.
Ideal for committees that have to defend their indicators before a governing body.
Understand→ Practise→ Go deeper
Participants do not stay in the audience: faced with an indicator that moves — retention down twelve points — they choose a first reading, then check what it assumes before concluding.
Tell a useful indicator apart from a decorative one, and set the rest aside.
Write an operational definition: source, frequency, owner.
Interpret a variation without hastily assigning it a cause.
Connect each indicator to a decision and to an owner.
The workshop starts from what you already track: your current dashboards, the numbers your board asks for and the ones no one looks at.
Your current dashboards and the numbers your board asks for are the raw material of the training.
Receive the next dates as soon as they are published.
Be notified of upcoming trainingNot sure which format suits your committee? Let's talk about your context.