A diagnostic is often used to confirm that things are being done well.
Are we looking for confirmation, or for the place where the next effort will have the most effect?
Production, resources and infrastructure
What we know deeply
How we work with you
Produce a defensible diagnostic across eleven stages, situate the organization on a comparable scale and turn the picture into priorities leadership can stand behind.
Are your integration initiatives producing an effect, or only activity?
Assess→ Situate→ Prioritize→ Track
A diagnostic is often used to confirm that things are being done well.
Are we looking for confirmation, or for the place where the next effort will have the most effect?
An organization scores well on onboarding, and poorly on steering.
Should the strength be reinforced, or should what comes before it be taken up first?
The framework exists, and it is written down.
Is it applied, or only written?
A flawless welcome can mask an absent plan.
How far can a downstream strength compensate for an upstream weakness?
An upstream weakness is paid for downstream.
By the end of the training, the participant will be able to:
The level neither rewards nor penalizes: it indicates what kind of effort becomes relevant. An organization can be at level 3 on onboarding and level 1 on steering.
Intégramètre
Eleven stages, seventy activities assessed.
We act case by case.
Informal, reactive efforts carried by a few individuals. The structure has yet to be built.
It works, in some places.
Visible but localized efforts. Overall alignment has yet to be consolidated.
The framework exists and it is followed.
A formal framework is in place. Collective ownership has yet to deepen.
We measure and we adjust.
Integrated practices, tracked over time and corrected on the basis of what they produce.
The level follows from the assessment of activities stage by stage. It is always read with the context: on its own, it says nothing useful.
A framework structured in line with relevant principles of the ISO 30415 standard on diversity and inclusion; the Intégramètre keeps its own assessment system and is neither certified nor validated by ISO.
The same framework. Three levels of depth, depending on what your team needs to be able to do.
Read a picture and situate the organization.
Ideal for a leadership team that wants to learn to read a picture already produced.
Produce the diagnostic and defend the prioritization.
Ideal for teams that have to run the diagnostic themselves.
Steer the initiative and account for it.
Ideal for committees that steer the initiative over time.
Understand→ Practise→ Go deeper
Participants do not stay in the audience: faced with a mixed picture — a strength in onboarding, a gap in steering — they choose a first response, then check what it assumes before acting.
Rate the activities of a stage on a common scale.
Position the organization on the four levels of maturity.
Rank the gaps by expected effect, not by ease.
Define the conditions for repeating the diagnostic.
The workshop is built from your reality: the stages you suspect are fragile, the indicators you already track, and the picture you have — or do not yet have.
The stages you suspect are fragile and the picture you already have, or do not yet have, are the raw material of the training.
Receive the next dates as soon as they are published.
Be notified of upcoming trainingNot sure which format suits your organization? Let's talk about your context.